Thermal Myth No.1 ~ 'Thermal imaging cameras are too expensive for commercial use'

An individual thermal imaging camera may be more expensive than a single CCTV camera but if deployed in the right way, thermal technology is an affordable option that can undoubtedly save you money. The key cost advantage of thermals is that fewer units can be deployed to provide effective surveillance of a given area. For example, a single, top quality thermal unit will do the work of several conventional CCTV cameras when it comes to perimeter security, or open area protection. With effective threat-detection ranges measured in kilometers, thermal cameras are also more affordable than measures such as buried-cable systems, or fence-detection technology. And with fewer units required, groundwork and installation costs are reduced. Thermal cameras don’t require additional lighting to be installed, which saves on up-front costs and on ongoing running costs.

In weighing up the cost of thermal imaging cameras versus alternatives, a careful analysis of the true, total cost - including purchase, operation and maintenance - reveals that thermals are very often best value. And it’s also worth remembering that the cost of good quality thermal surveillance is also coming down, thanks to the introduction of competitive options from companies (for example FLIR’s H-Series hand held camera and D-Series internal PTZ camera) which, though more economical, still incorporate high-end technology.